The two most important acronyms in operational resilience are RTO and RPO. Recovery Time Objective (RTO) and Recovery Point Objective (RPO), taken together, form the backbone of any disaster recovery and continuity strategy.
However, many businesses miscalculate these critical parameters, leading to vulnerabilities far beyond mere data loss. Poorly defined RTOs and RPOs can erode customer trust, inflict financial damage, and even push businesses into regulatory hot water. This article will explore the damaging consequences of getting RTO and RPO wrong and how accurate targets help protect your business and customers.
RTO And RPO: What They Are and Why They Matter
Before discussing the risks of getting them wrong, let’s take a moment to define these two acronyms:
- Recovery Time Objective (RTO): RTO is the maximum acceptable amount of time an application, system, or process can be offline without causing significant harm to the business. It measures how quickly you need to recover a workload or service during an outage. For example, an e-commerce platform may set an RTO of one hour, meaning operations must resume within that timeframe to avoid revenue loss or customer dissatisfaction.
- Recovery Point Objective (RPO): RPO, on the other hand, defines the maximum age of data that can be recovered during a disaster. It essentially answers the question, “How much data can we afford to lose?” An RPO of 30 minutes implies that backups have to occur every half-hour, safeguarding nearly ‘real-time’ data.
Together, these objectives help shape your response and recovery processes. However, improper configurations can have far-reaching consequences.
What Are the Consequences of Getting Your RTO and RPO Wrong?
Here’s what’s at stake when these metrics are misaligned with your business objectives:
1. Creating a false sense of security
When businesses define overly optimistic RTOs and RPOs without the infrastructure or resources in place to support them, it can create a false sense of security. In other words, IT teams may feel confident in their plans only to discover that during an actual incident recovery takes twice as long or that several days’ worth of data is unrecoverable. Alternatively, setting overly relaxed targets can lead to complacency among stakeholders. If managers believe they have plenty of time to recover but the business impact escalates quickly, the lack of preparedness can make operational recovery more expensive and time-consuming. Always base your RTO and RPO on a thorough risk assessment of your own systems, rather than industry benchmarks or assumptions about what your systems might handle under pressure.
2. Raising costs for underperforming solutions
Overly ambitious RTO and RPO targets can lead companies to overspend on expensive solutions that fail to deliver when stress tested. For instance, implementing cutting-edge storage technology without fully testing its ability to meet real-world demands can strain your IT budget without offering equivalent protection. Conversely, targeting relaxed recovery times might reduce upfront costs but risks higher long-term expenses due to extended downtime or a slower recovery. Finding the right balance ensures you’re investing in efficient, cost-effective disaster recovery capabilities that deliver when it matters the most.
3. Eroding customer trust and brand reputation
Downtime can chip away at customer confidence as well as impacting your day-to-day operations. Customers are less forgiving of data breaches than they used to be, expecting a robust disaster preparedness plan and continuity strategy in place to protect their service. If recovery from an incident is delayed or disorganised, especially if this is due to poor organisation on your part, customers may lose faith in your company, leading to lost revenues and damaged relationships. Word travels quickly whenever a major breach or shutdown takes place, with news quickly spreading to your customers, competitors, and supply partners through LinkedIn and other social channels. Even if your data is recoverable, a perceived sluggish response by your team can permanently impact your brand reputation. Accurate and effective RTO and RPO targets set realistic benchmarks to help you recover systems swiftly and maintain trust in your services.
4. Misaligned resources and prolonged downtime
Disaster recovery plans rely on precise, coordinated action across teams and systems. Unfortunately, poorly defined RTO and RPO targets create gaps in planning, such as insufficient resources allocated to critical systems or miscommunication among recovery teams. This can result in confusion and miscommunication during crises, delayed response times, and prolonged downtime for dependent systems. To avoid this, regularly test and validate your disaster recovery processes to ensure alignment between targets, capabilities, and roles.
Strengthen Your Disaster Recovery Strategy Today With Nexstor
Discover the value of an optimised RTO and RPO with Nexstor’s tailored disaster recovery solutions. Download our guide today to find out more. For additional insights into backup and recovery best practices, please explore our dedicated Backup and Disaster Recovery solutions.
Image source: Canva
